Compassionate Detachment: Loving Enough to Let Go
Posted: Tuesday, May 26, 2009
by Ralph P. Brown
Mirrored Windows
When I was young I discovered a chrysalis hanging from a branch in some scrub oak near our house. Each day after this discovery I would go out and check on this chrysalis in the hopes of seeing the butterfly that I knew was inside. You can imagine how excited I was when one day I came out to find the head of this butterfly sticking out from a hole in the bottom of the cocoon!
Had I known then what I know now about compassionate detachment , that butterfly would have lived to fulfill its life's mission. I learned much later in life that the struggle I had witnessed was actually necessary for the butterfly to live. The effort to get out of the cocoon causes fluid to be pumped into the wings and without that fluid the butterfly can't unroll. By stepping in and interfering with this process I didn't allo w the butterfly to develop according to its nature . I prevented the struggle that was necessary to make it strong.
Compassionate detachment simply means we are not attached physically, spiritually, mentally and especially emotionally to the events, things, and people in our lives that we have compassion for. This does not mean we don't care because compassion is caring. It means we are not attached in a way that fails to serve the highest good of all.
What exactly is the highest good? The truth is that most of the time we just don't know. Unfortunately, t hat doesn't stop us from trying to insert our wisdom and sometimes even insisting that people take our advice. However well intentioned I was when I was younger, I didn't know what was for the highest good of the butterfly and my interference and insistence cost that creature its life.
If it was difficult to watch the struggle of a butterfly, how difficult must it be to watch the struggle of a loved one?
What if it is your child? Suppose a child was born into a loving, yet very over-protective family. The parents, in their idea of love declared, "Our child will be protected from all of the evils of life. Kids will never make fun of him or tease him because we will never allow him out of the house. He will stay here where he is loved and protected. He will never have to be subjected to germs and pollutants no r will anything harmful every come into contact with him."
The mother would cook every meal for him throughout the rest of his life. He will never have to cook and risk being burned by a hot stove. The father said, "He will never have to work because he could be injured on the job and we would never want to see our child hurt." They agreed that since he would never have to work he would never have to go to school. "Why should we subject him to cruel and unkind people? Why should he have t o exert all that effort to learn anyway? Plus the history books are full of stories of war, famine, slavery and other atrocities. It is better that he not have to hear such negative things."
They also agreed that he should never date or marry because how easy would it be for a girl to break his heart ? "It is better to just keep him here with us where he is loved and protected," they said. They told him, "Don't run, don't jump, don't climb on things and stay out of all the rooms where there are dangerous things because we love you and don't want to see you get hurt. It's for your own good." Okay, by now you are probably saying, "I get the point!" I give you this extreme and hypothetical situation to overstate that not all struggle or pain is bad .
There is a fine line between aiding someone - and carrying them in a way that robs them of the life lessons needed to make them strong and help them become capable of carrying out their life's mission. Each person comes into this world with his own load, for which he and he alone is responsible. Anyone who attempts to carry another's load (or shirk his own) is not serving anyone's highest good. In fact, that is a disservice and could stunt or prevent the growth necessary to carry them through their lie's mission. Sometimes you have to love a person enough to let go. Let them learn their lessons.
When you let go of someone by being compassionately detached, you don't let go so they fall. You let go so they can fly!
This Article has been viewed 1,642 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (1 total)I really enjoyed your article. I think that we too often rush to rescue someone, and by doing so, they miss out on the valuable experience of figuring out how to get through the struggle on their own. Instead of helping we dis-empower.As for myself, I know that the most valuable lessons I have learned and a true appreciation of life have occurred following a personal struggle, which I eventually mastered to come out stronger on the other side of the cocoon.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.